ufc-294-odds-picks-predictions-nathaniel-wood-vs-muhammad-naimov-betting-preview-october-21

UFC 294 Odds, Pick & Prediction for Nathaniel Wood vs Muhammad Naimov: Bank on 15-Minute Tangle (Saturday, October 21)

Nathaniel Wood vs Muhammad Naimov Odds

Wood Odds
-320
Naimov Odds
+260
Over/Under
2.5 (-160 / +126)
Location
Etihad Arena in Abu Dhabi
Time
11 a.m. ET
Channel
ESPN+
Odds as of Saturday and via FanDuel. Wager on UFC 294 with our FanDuel promo code!

In an intriguing featherweight clash on the UFC 294 preliminary card, Nathaniel Wood looks to keep the good times going when he meets Muhammad Naimov.

Wood is 3-0 in the UFC since a multi-year layoff and a drop to 145 pounds. The Englishman now meets Tajikistan’s Naimov, who knocked out lightweight Jamie Mullarkey in his recent UFC debut.

Oddsmakers favor the more experienced fighter and have Wood as a heavy favorite in the prelim bout. Is it warranted?

Here’s my Wood vs Naimov preview for UFC 294.

_InlineAdBlock

Tale of the Tape

Wood Naimov
Record 20-5 9-2
Avg. Fight Time 12:44 11:30
Height 5’6″ 5’9″
Weight 146 pounds 145.5 pounds
Reach 69 inches 70 inches
Stance Orthodox Orthodox
Date of birth 5/8/1983 8/7/1994
Sig Strikes Per Min 6.24 3.48
SS Accuracy 49% 40%
SS Absorbed Per Min 4.35 5.53
SS Defense 57% 44%
Take Down Avg 1.70 0.00
TD Acc 54% 0%
TD Def 76% 50%
Submission Avg 0.5 0.0

On average, featherweight bouts at the UFC level go to a decision at a 54.8% clip (-121 implied odds), roughly in line with the best available odds (-122) for Saturday’s clash between Wood and Naimov.

Wood, a former bantamweight, is extremely quick and technical but carries only a little power in his hands. And Naimov has never been finished across 16 amateur and professional bouts.

[relatedarticle articleimageurl=”https://images.actionnetwork.com/blog/2023/10/GettyImages-1488032319.jpg” linktext=”UFC 294 Props: 9 MMA Prop Squad Picks for Makhachev vs Volkanovski 2″ link=”https://www.actionnetwork.com/mma/ufc-294-props-mma-prop-squad-picks-saturday-october-21″][/relatedarticle]

Naimov – the true featherweight with advantages in height (three inches taller), reach (one inch) and power – seems the likelier of the pair to finish this fight via strikes.

Wood is an incredibly well-rounded fighter, but he does tend to get cracked and wobble a couple of times per fight, leading to opportunities for his opponents to finish or swinging the round optics against himself for scoring purposes.

_InlineAdBlock

Wood vs Naimov Pick

I expect this bout to reach a decision more than 60% of the time (projected -157) and would bet that prop up to -145.

I also expect Wood to win that decision more often than not and projected his decision prop at +103 (listed +120 at FanDuel). Consider including the plus-money prop on round-robin tickets.

I prefer to bet the fight to reach a decision – rather than betting on Wood to win that decision – because Naimov could swing a fight that Wood is otherwise winning back in his favor on a couple of brief moments.

He could do that by wobbling Wood and landing the most impactful shot in two of the three rounds, thereby erasing most of Wood’s minute-winning.

From a moneyline perspective, this is a ‘dog-or-pass spot with Naimov (projected +239, listed +270 at BetMGM), but I would rather bet him to survive and keep this fight close and competitive for the duration.

[quickslip picktext=”Pick: Wood vs Naimov goes to decision (-122)” linktext=”Bet GTD Instantly at FanDuel With QuickSlip!” link=”https://switchboard.actionnetwork.com/v1/deeplink?marketId=42.400925837&selectionId=7156226&context=qs-articles” linkfollow=”false” bookthumbnaillogo=”https://assets.actionnetwork.com/392973_FanDuel.png”][/quickslip]

[appcard imageurl=”https://assets.actionnetwork.com/807135_UFCArticleCard.png” cta=”The must-have app for UFC bettors” firstupsell=”The best UFC betting scoreboard” secondupsell=”Free picks from proven pros” thirdupsell=”Live win probabilities for your bets” buttontext=”DOWNLOAD NOW” buttonurl=”https://action.onelink.me/qhpb/5894db61″][/appcard]


Posted

in

by